15-10-2016 01:54 pm
15-10-2016 01:55 pm
15-10-2016 07:56 pm
16-10-2016 01:32 am
Good Morning everyone...
Good Luck all
16-10-2016 01:38 am
18-10-2016 03:11 am
Good morning sifu
I nearly fell of my chair when i discovered you here in the forum again. A very, very pleasant surprise indeed!!!
Greetings aside, I'm at a bind at the moment. I have my own 3D worksheet and I've been using it for several months now. All 3D data are from Magnum podium result. I do get some great result from it but most of the time I just miss the mark.
Missing 1D is not much of a problem for me as long as the 3D is correct. Slowly but surely I will learn to improve. However, missing the 3D is my biggest problem!!
For this month, I notice that 3D that hit podium came from starter and cons from the previous 2 draw. Eg. 16/10 (Sunday) result came from 12/10 (Wed) draw. I've double and triple check all other draws this month and it clearly shows the result always came from the 2 previous draw.
I grouped together only the 3Ds from starter and cons that is in my worksheet. Of course there can sometimes be more than 10 set of 3Ds. Grouping those 3Ds was easy. Selecting the right 3D is the problem. I'm hoping that you might be able nudge me towards the right direction so that from more than 10 sets it could maybe just come down to 3 or 2 only. Of course less is better. I've tried to select only those with missing 1D and still not able to choose correctly. The 3Ds are out there in the open but I just could not see them. Please advice.
18-10-2016 05:54 pm
Good evening everyone...
The same method of predictions applicable to both Magnum and Osaka 4D...
18-10-2016 06:00 pm
Good day tykosam
It is possible to scale down to 2 or 3 sets of podium 3D for the draw (Even 1 set of podium 3D if you want). There are many ways to achieve that...
Second method.. (well is actually a concept)
Is just that you need different ways or methods to pinpoint the sets of 3D that possible may appear in the draw...
19-10-2016 12:40 am
Thanks sifu for replying. Actually I wrote a reply to you just now. But somehow it did not appeared.
These are the shortlisted 3Ds
The 4Ds are as below
I really hope those 3Ds are in your pandora sifu. Otherwise, I have to go through my lenghty method once again. I'm all drowned out now. I just can't afford to look at those numbers again tonigt.
19-10-2016 12:43 am
Well, not wise to use a bullet list then.
753 = 3057, 3275, 3875
553 = 3544
841 = 4184
It's already embarassing to show a great sifu your findings. And when you posted them, every thing goes mumble jumble. Amateurs!!
19-10-2016 01:57 am
I am not that great as what you had put. I had been in your position before years ago and through hardwork, managed to figure out how the 4D lottery works.
19-10-2016 02:06 am
I just do a quick check on your numbers...
Hope it helps
19-10-2016 06:26 am
Good morning sifu.
Thanks alot for the pandora. I feel honored that sifu even took time to do some cross reference for my numbers. It surely helps me alot.
I'm tweaking my prediction a little bit by comparing your pandora to the 3Ds from Sat special and cons.
There were some typo in my set of 3Ds earlier. It should had been 533 and not 553. The 4D should had been 3354. Another 1 of many of my amateurish mistakes.
19-10-2016 11:23 am
19-10-2016 11:26 am
Oh.. forgets to mentioned.... OSAKA's 3D/4D predictions just for fun without doing any numbering performance checking... (I have no past database on OSAKA, just using a few past podium numbers to predict)