March 2014 4D Predictions page 33

Hi Sifu,

Lets talk abt 3d 456 (just for case study sake).

" ...Total draw 3718, Wed freq - 52, Sat freq - 81, Sun freq - 91, Day 1-10 = 65, Day 11 - 20 = 77, Day 21 - 31 = 82
Last 2 hits 1st prize both in Sep 2013, 6453 & 6454
This month march already hit 7 and an average per month hit for 456 is about 4.4 to 4.7. But past record shows 2010, 2011 show 3D 456 had 9 hits.... and from these 9 hits, 2 hits fall in to after Day 21 - 31...."

I understand the above record of 3d 456 that you are showing me. As a matter of fact, I have them too (in more specific details, I must add).

The above record - such as the total nos. of appearances for 456x to appear on a certain period of the mth (the first 10 days and the subsequent 20th and 30th days periods), the nos. of hits in March, its average hits of abt 5/mth etc - is ONLY showing the possibility of this particular 3d from appearing in the next draw for ALL prizes group. In order to determine whether it is good for T3 (Top3 prizes) or not, you will have to go one step deeper. Thats the 3DTP method that I was talking about.

Ok, lets talk abt the chances for 3d 456 to appear for the last 3 mth of March in all prizes first. We will have to know this first before we even think abt catching it at T3, right ?

Like yr record (and mine too) shows, 456x so far had appeared 7 times already in March. Is that considered a lot for it ? Has it reached its max yet ?

In order to answer these questions, we will have to look at its past historical data. The further back we look, the cleared will be the picture - up to a certain point in time that is.

Generally, for this type 3d analysis to determine its current performance in ALL prize groups, I would look backward for abt a year until beginning of year 2013, in order to follow its yearly-cycle. Anything further than that for this kind of analysis, the data may start to become "distorted and irrelevant". For other type of analysis, I may go back even further - different analysis, different criteria.

From Jan 2013 to Feb 20143 (approx.1 year cycle), average hit per mth is 5 hits. Lowest hit - 1 in Jan '14 (which tallies nicely with a low hit of 2 in Jan '13.) High hits are 8 in Jul '13 & 10 in Sep '13. Remember again, so far it is at 7 hits for Mar '14.

It had just came out of 5 mths of low hits, from Oct '13 to Feb'14. The hits from Oct '13 onwards are 6 (Oct), 3(Nov), 4(Dec), 1(Jan) and 5 (Feb).

The number of hits in Jan '13 & Jan '14, and Feb '13 and Feb '14 are almost a mirror image of each other - both mths for both years were on low-hit frequency. Mar'13 was a high-hit mth and it seems that at the present 7 hits already, Mar'14 would also probably be a high-hit mth too.

With only 3 more draws to go b4 end mth, can 456x appears (in any prize group) again ? Going by the previous 5 low-hit mths, with a severe one in Jan (1 hit only), and also its high-mth hit of 8 hits and 10 hits, the answer is leaning more towards a Yes, it could.

Is the probability good for it appear in the last week of the mth ? Going by the cluster of its appearances in the 1st week of the mth (hits on 2/3 and three multiple hits on 8/3) and only 1 hit (19/3) for the 10-20 days of the mth, followed by 2 hits on the 23/3, the chances for it to appear again for the last few days of the mth looks good.

So theoretically, as far as hitting its high and appearing in the current period of the mth is concerned, 3d 456 seems to have passed on both account. Which means that it would be worth a wager to bet that it will appear again somewhere in the next 3 draws (for all prize group, that is). Worst scenario is that it may skip one draw on Wed and then appear in the weekend draw. If no show for all 3 draws, then the beginning part of April is a MUST to follow.

Ok, that settles the question of whether 456x will appears for all prize group in the near term. Now comes the tricky part - the 6 million dollars question.

Will it come out in podium prizes ? What are the probability for it to do so ?

Thats where all the records/data of 456x that we had just discussed above will NOT show. Like I had said, we have to go one step deeper for that.

Here goes again......

All the data so far only show whether the 3d can appear in all prize groups. For 3DTP, we have to look at the historical data of T3 hit-gap - i.e. at which appearances gaps will this 3d usually move up to the podium prize group. Still following, mate ?

In 3DTP, for accuracy in determination of the T3 gaps, I go ALL the way back to 1986 for its data. This is simply becoz 3DTP is a very BIG cycle (as we all know that the numbers of hits at T3 are much much lesser than hits in all prize groups). There will only be abt 3 to 4 cycles to guide us in our prediction in a period of 27 years - just barely sufficiently to make any meaningful analysis. Anything lesser would not present an actual overall picture of whats to come next.

Below is a list of T3 Gaps up to 18/9/11 for your reference to understand the 3DTP method easier. Take a look, bro -

T3 Gaps
31 (present gap as at 23/3 draw)
0 (21/9/13)
3 (24/8/13)
14 (29/6/13)
17 (17/3/13)
9
0
2
2
10
17
19
0
0
9
0 (as at 18/9/11)

As can be seen from the above T3 Gap list ( I had shortened it here till 18/9/11, cant show u all the way to 1986. Would be too long), 3d 456 had just completed its 2 medium-gaps (17 and 14 gaps on 17/3/13 and 29/6/13 respectively), completed 2 short-gaps (3 and 0 gaps on 24/8/13 and 21/9/13 respectively) and its now on a long-gap in its 3DTP cycle at 31 Gap as of today. Longest T3 Gaps ever for it since 1986 was 34 Gaps. U can draw your own conclusion based on that, mate.

Further, this 3d has a history of multiple sets showing in a single draw during its high-hitting mth. So far in March this mth, there were 3 multiples appearances on 8/3/14 and 2 on 23/3/14. With another multiple showing in the last 3 draws before mth end, that will really hit it at the max long gap of 34, given that it is already at Gap 31 now.

giugno128 (Sifu)	Msg #641 26-03-2014 11:12 am Hi members The abovementioned methods are one effective way of looking into 4D or that missed 1D (Without using Pandora 4D system). If you can understand and master the skill, then you can forgets about Pandora 4D system.... Whatever method you choose, a good 2D and 3D is a most. That is why I keep on repeats and repeats, train yourself in 2D and 3Ds. The rest will be data looking into the past records... Good Luck
faircash1000	Msg #642 26-03-2014 12:24 pm for damacai today 9897 5634 0969 6472 8142 9188 any comment sifu?
giugno128 (Sifu)	Msg #643 26-03-2014 12:30 pm Hi faircash1000 DaMaCai, I cannot comments. Do no have the data. Sorry
fastluo	Msg #644 26-03-2014 01:03 pm yesterday damacai come 3707.. i got a dream but i not take that number to busy..so dispointed.. huhuhuhu
luc (Sifu)	Msg #645 26-03-2014 02:32 pm Hi Sifu, Am glad to have found someone who is on the same frequency and wavelength abt 4d analysis. Thats my purpose of coming online to participate in 4d forums, websites and blogs - to talk shop abt 4d topics with someone who is in the know. Previously I was very active in some fb pages and blogs on 4d discussions but the folks there were mostly my followers just following my numbers. Got tired of those sites and left when the numbers of followers grew too large, with none able to nor are interested in the intricacies of 4d predictions. "....this pattern was intercepted by the SGPools frequent change of machines during the draws.." Fully agreed with you on this, bro. In the recent years, with the 'blooming' of 4d predictions websites all over the internet, SgPools must have gotten wind of the growing numbers of people like us who are trying to raise our winning odds against them by numbers analysis. To 'trip' us up and make our 'job' more difficult, they had resorted to change the balls-set and ball-machines on every single draw. This definitely will affect the results to a certain extent as there are differences in the weight of each ball in each balls-set. Though they claim that the variations in the weight of the balls are very slight, it is pretty obvious too that the chances of any digit ball being sucked up by the machine will change from balls-set to balls-set. As we do not have the info on the weight of each ball in each balls-set, that becomes the unknown factor that we, as 4d predictionists, will have to deal with in the equation of our analysis. It lessen our chances of success somewhat when we are trying to derive info from past historical data. It is similar to the practices of casinos operators when they frequently "wash the cards" to counter those who are practising card-reading by memorizing the outcome of the cards. In the past, when 4d prediction is not such a commonly known phenomenon, SgPools changed their balls and balls machine only once every few mths. The flow of the results drawn by a single constant single device was pretty uninterrupted then and forecasting 4d numbers were so much easier, if you know the trick that is. Back then I had a method I called as "3D components" prediction system to determine the chance of appearance for an eventual 4D number. That system worked like a charm and the hit rate was a very high 70-80% success then. The success rate of that method was so good that I had dared to bet anything from SGD $300 - $900 for a SINGLE system number. Winnings in the 5-figures were quite a monthly affair then. Sometimes even more than once in a single month. Too bad I had not develop the 3DTP method yet back then to catch the real Big Ones at the podium prizes. A couple of T3 hits with bets worth a few hundred bucks each could have easily landed winnings up to 6-figures. Anyway, my own methods are not static permanently. It evolves and changes over the years to counter whatever "tricks" that the gaming operators have up their sleeves. Any prediction method over time, I believe, will start to lose its effectiveness and some tweaks and minor changes must be made to it in order for it to stay relevant and up-to-date. All the gaming operators can (and will too, I assure u) come up with all sorts of deterrents to knock the calculating punters off their balances and reduce their probability of winning. But any games that are involved in numbers and are played over and over again, will soon settled into a discernible pattern or trend due to the Law of Averages and the Law of Probability. Thats when "cycles" start to form. They are our 'crystal balls' of sorts whereby we can get a glimpse of the future by looking back into the past (past data). Without this phenomenon, we, the predictionists, can all close shop as we are neither fortune-tellers or psychics. To the untrained eyes, these cycles are not so easily detectable as there are many many cycles all running simultaneously in a game like 4D - small cycles (short gaps), big cycles (long gaps) and even cycles within cycles. All these may make one thinks that 4D is only a random game and no predictable pattern can be made out of it. But in all these chaotic mass of data thats facing us, there is Order in it, if you know where to look for it. There is a kind of rule or law that future outcomes are loosely following - i.e. The Law of Chaotic Order which dictates that what may initially appears to be random happenings in a chaotic manner may indeed be following a certain rule of its own. What that rule is , is what we are trying to decipher. Get that right, in however small a percentage, and you are already way up front from the general mass who are just buying blindly. Hone that deciphering skill further and you will be able to stand toe to toe with the Big Boys and take them down a peg or two from time to time.
hasta	Msg #646 26-03-2014 02:47 pm hi Sifu Giugno...Any 3D for today sgpools :)
giugno128 (Sifu)	Msg #647 26-03-2014 02:54 pm Hi hasta Pls read Msg#653 & Msg#656, some are very good 3Ds and 4Ds... Hope you can be laughing tonite.. Good Luck
hasta	Msg #648 26-03-2014 03:04 pm Hiihiii Thank you Sifu Giugno Sifu Best4 and LuC and others Sifu :)
giugno128 (Sifu)	Msg #649 26-03-2014 03:12 pm Hi luc Yes, agreed with you. Last times when I put up about 100 numbers, all being gun down one by one either being thrown into Starters or Consolations or just twisted by the upside down trick or 1D misled. That is one reason Pandora 4D system (4x4 matrix) was born. Insteads of 10,000 numbers to look at, it scale down to max 256 (sometimes lesser than 256) and the hit results are still very good. Currently, monitoring a few good Pandora Boxes and some even hits 2 to 3 podiums in single draw. That do not stop me to look deeper....2D and 3D are the enhaced simple method but gave quiet a good results also. When I starts developing Blackhole, it involved lots of calculations but recently, I created a chart that helps to scale down all these tedious methods. Blackhole is still at initial stage and I only concentrate on the podium numbers, hope to find a unique system to capture a small trend of 10 draws... During the workout an hour ago, noticed that the patterns between the 1st, 2nd and 3rd prizes are totally different. Blackhole can predicts 1st and 2nd with a few digits but 3rd prize is totally unconsistant. Well for me, I do not bet hundreds in a draw but always limits to about S$20 with only two numbers... so far, always gain with ibox to cover the costs. Hopefully, in April, where the system is more stable, we can look into direct numbers.... Good Luck
luc (Sifu)	Msg #650 26-03-2014 04:21 pm Hi Sifu, Lets talk abt 3d 456 (just for case study sake). " ...Total draw 3718, Wed freq - 52, Sat freq - 81, Sun freq - 91, Day 1-10 = 65, Day 11 - 20 = 77, Day 21 - 31 = 82 Last 2 hits 1st prize both in Sep 2013, 6453 & 6454 This month march already hit 7 and an average per month hit for 456 is about 4.4 to 4.7. But past record shows 2010, 2011 show 3D 456 had 9 hits.... and from these 9 hits, 2 hits fall in to after Day 21 - 31...." I understand the above record of 3d 456 that you are showing me. As a matter of fact, I have them too (in more specific details, I must add). The above record - such as the total nos. of appearances for 456x to appear on a certain period of the mth (the first 10 days and the subsequent 20th and 30th days periods), the nos. of hits in March, its average hits of abt 5/mth etc - is ONLY showing the possibility of this particular 3d from appearing in the next draw for ALL prizes group. In order to determine whether it is good for T3 (Top3 prizes) or not, you will have to go one step deeper. Thats the 3DTP method that I was talking about. Ok, lets talk abt the chances for 3d 456 to appear for the last 3 mth of March in all prizes first. We will have to know this first before we even think abt catching it at T3, right ? Like yr record (and mine too) shows, 456x so far had appeared 7 times already in March. Is that considered a lot for it ? Has it reached its max yet ? In order to answer these questions, we will have to look at its past historical data. The further back we look, the cleared will be the picture - up to a certain point in time that is. Generally, for this type 3d analysis to determine its current performance in ALL prize groups, I would look backward for abt a year until beginning of year 2013, in order to follow its yearly-cycle. Anything further than that for this kind of analysis, the data may start to become "distorted and irrelevant". For other type of analysis, I may go back even further - different analysis, different criteria. From Jan 2013 to Feb 20143 (approx.1 year cycle), average hit per mth is 5 hits. Lowest hit - 1 in Jan '14 (which tallies nicely with a low hit of 2 in Jan '13.) High hits are 8 in Jul '13 & 10 in Sep '13. Remember again, so far it is at 7 hits for Mar '14. It had just came out of 5 mths of low hits, from Oct '13 to Feb'14. The hits from Oct '13 onwards are 6 (Oct), 3(Nov), 4(Dec), 1(Jan) and 5 (Feb). The number of hits in Jan '13 & Jan '14, and Feb '13 and Feb '14 are almost a mirror image of each other - both mths for both years were on low-hit frequency. Mar'13 was a high-hit mth and it seems that at the present 7 hits already, Mar'14 would also probably be a high-hit mth too. With only 3 more draws to go b4 end mth, can 456x appears (in any prize group) again ? Going by the previous 5 low-hit mths, with a severe one in Jan (1 hit only), and also its high-mth hit of 8 hits and 10 hits, the answer is leaning more towards a Yes, it could. Is the probability good for it appear in the last week of the mth ? Going by the cluster of its appearances in the 1st week of the mth (hits on 2/3 and three multiple hits on 8/3) and only 1 hit (19/3) for the 10-20 days of the mth, followed by 2 hits on the 23/3, the chances for it to appear again for the last few days of the mth looks good. So theoretically, as far as hitting its high and appearing in the current period of the mth is concerned, 3d 456 seems to have passed on both account. Which means that it would be worth a wager to bet that it will appear again somewhere in the next 3 draws (for all prize group, that is). Worst scenario is that it may skip one draw on Wed and then appear in the weekend draw. If no show for all 3 draws, then the beginning part of April is a MUST to follow. Ok, that settles the question of whether 456x will appears for all prize group in the near term. Now comes the tricky part - the 6 million dollars question. Will it come out in podium prizes ? What are the probability for it to do so ? Thats where all the records/data of 456x that we had just discussed above will NOT show. Like I had said, we have to go one step deeper for that. Here goes again...... All the data so far only show whether the 3d can appear in all prize groups. For 3DTP, we have to look at the historical data of T3 hit-gap - i.e. at which appearances gaps will this 3d usually move up to the podium prize group. Still following, mate ? In 3DTP, for accuracy in determination of the T3 gaps, I go ALL the way back to 1986 for its data. This is simply becoz 3DTP is a very BIG cycle (as we all know that the numbers of hits at T3 are much much lesser than hits in all prize groups). There will only be abt 3 to 4 cycles to guide us in our prediction in a period of 27 years - just barely sufficiently to make any meaningful analysis. Anything lesser would not present an actual overall picture of whats to come next. Below is a list of T3 Gaps up to 18/9/11 for your reference to understand the 3DTP method easier. Take a look, bro - T3 Gaps 31 (present gap as at 23/3 draw) 0 (21/9/13) 3 (24/8/13) 14 (29/6/13) 17 (17/3/13) 9 0 2 2 10 17 19 0 0 9 0 (as at 18/9/11) As can be seen from the above T3 Gap list ( I had shortened it here till 18/9/11, cant show u all the way to 1986. Would be too long), 3d 456 had just completed its 2 medium-gaps (17 and 14 gaps on 17/3/13 and 29/6/13 respectively), completed 2 short-gaps (3 and 0 gaps on 24/8/13 and 21/9/13 respectively) and its now on a long-gap in its 3DTP cycle at 31 Gap as of today. Longest T3 Gaps ever for it since 1986 was 34 Gaps. U can draw your own conclusion based on that, mate. Further, this 3d has a history of multiple sets showing in a single draw during its high-hitting mth. So far in March this mth, there were 3 multiples appearances on 8/3/14 and 2 on 23/3/14. With another multiple showing in the last 3 draws before mth end, that will really hit it at the max long gap of 34, given that it is already at Gap 31 now.
luc (Sifu)	Msg #651 26-03-2014 04:31 pm Hi Sifu, "..Now question is which 4D? (3D = 456) In this area, I will look into all ten numbers.... listed down all hits for the past 1 year. Interesting is that only 4 numbers did not come out in March 2014 and they are 4567 - 4569 - 4566 - 4556. By looking into Marh Month for past years, I would choose 4567 & 4569...." Same same, bro. Thats EXACTLY what I do too. Analyzed all the 10 nos. individually, in as many ways as possible to finetune and catch the most possible ones. For that I go back several years to year 2010 data, to have a clearer picture of that particular 4d number's performances over the period. For 3d 456 ABCDs, system 4567 and 4569 are my Top priority ones. the ones I put more $$$ on. For its AABC, out of 4456, 4556 and 4566, the first one is my Top priority. 4556 and 4566 I cover a bit too. Take note that 3D analysis for AABC is not as reliable as for ABCD, simply becoz it has lesser 3d components than a ABCD number. Therefore for AABC I dun rely too much on 3d prediction. I use other methods.
SK	Msg #652 26-03-2014 04:31 pm Dear sifu. Any predictions for magnum today.
luc (Sifu)	Msg #653 26-03-2014 05:07 pm Sifu, I have not really fathom your Pandora matrix system yet. But those digits that you used to fill up the W, X, Y and Z column, they are derived from the previous last result draw , is that right ? If it is, then somehow it is quite similar to how I derive my 3ds prediction too. Mine too cuts down from looking at 10,000 numbers to bet on, to around 250 numbers. Coincident or what eh ? ;) I do not use any fanciful software programs to churn out "golden" numbers, like what some paid so-called pro websites do. It is all in the head for me. How I look at the data that we have. Most times a pencil and a piece of paper is all I need. LOL. But hey, the results speak for itself, is that not ? Generally, you will be able to easily find more than 50% of 3ds coming from the very LAST result draw (except for the 1st Wed draw of the mth which is the Sg BigSweep draw. Can have some distortion there as the method used to get the winning numbers is slightly different from usual draws). Therefore, knowing that a good percentage of the 3d will come from the last draw, we can use that to our advantage when analyzing for 3ds for the next draw. A general thumb of the rule for me is that I will not follow that 3d if it does not appear anywhere at all in the last draw. Of course, at times 3ds not present in the last draw may still appear in the next draw, but we can only predict what is the norm (the highest possibility of a certain event to occur) and will not be able to predict the exception too. Being able to predict what stands a better chance to come out is already good enough as it is - perhaps it is as close as what we can humanly do as we do not possess a crystal ball to gaze into the future. So, if the digits for your Pandora method is derived from the last draw, then in effect what we are doing is not that different after all. The mere fact that this 3d analyzing method saw us missing winning numbers by only 1 digit, is already an indication that we are on the right track. If nothing close to our predicted numbers show up draw after draw, then that system can be considered as redundant or useless and its back to the drawing board to formulate another one eh ? ;)
luc (Sifu)	Msg #654 26-03-2014 05:08 pm Sifu, Btw, are u fm SG too, bro ? I am.
bestnumber	Msg #655 26-03-2014 05:46 pm Hi luc..... Ur predic same like my predic. Hope can shoot podium today.......hua....hua...hua......(how big my dreamzzzzzz) This r my predic number... I just play m6 only. 6473......6437......6347......6374 6457......6475......6745.......6754 6459.......6495.......6945......6954 How sad i am coz c'not buy due to still at my work place. And hope other friend here can kena..... Huhuhuhuhu so sad......
bestnumber	Msg #656 26-03-2014 05:52 pm Hi giugno128(sifu) any comment wt my predic? What do u think? Need ur advice ya bro.....
SK	Msg #657 26-03-2014 06:16 pm Dear sifu, Do you have any Pandora 3d predictions for Magnum today. TQ
luc (Sifu)	Msg #658 26-03-2014 06:32 pm Hi bestnumber, Remember all my numbers are only for SgPools I-BET play k. G'luck bro !~
chocolatefudge	Msg #659 26-03-2014 06:32 pm Hi everyone, I have been following this forum for a month time, currently reading threads from November onwards. It has not stopped amaze me for even one second about how everyone is able to find out the way to "decipher" the code. I certainly hope that I can be a part of these learning from everyone especially " giugno128, best4 and luc who has been putting up interesting topics. I just started to play 4D for a month and I hope it is not too late for me to join and start my prediction tool or method in cracking codes. I hope I can get all the help with y'all. Lets huat together And finally, good luck in coming draws.
chocolatefudge	Msg #660 26-03-2014 06:57 pm Hi members, Can any sifus shed some light on how to develop your own predictions tool?? As if where I am now, I am quite how you derive your 1 D and 2 Ds . As for 3Ds, I normally just simply get it from this forum. A specific question to LuC, may I know how do you collect so much data from the past? I can see you even isolated the cycle of gaps for numbers. Can I know where did you get your information from? Because for now, the only statistic website I am aware of is 4D2U Can any sifus help me to get better?

March 2014 4D Predictions

Related Topic